|
CHALLENGE
TO THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF THE SUFFOLK COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT'S PISTOL
LICENSING PROCEDURES
The Suffolk County Police Department's Pistol
Licensing Procedures Violate the First and Second Amendments to the United
States Constitution.
The First Amendment to the United States Constitution protects the
individual rights of speech and assembly, as well as certain other
fundamental rights. Inherent in our First Amendment freedoms is the right to
associate with whomever we choose, or, conversely, to not associate with
persons with whom we choose not to associate.
The designated handgun licensing officer for most of Suffolk County is the
Suffolk County Police Commissioner. His procedures for determining
eligibility for a pistol license include a requirement that applicants must
provide four character references from residents of Suffolk County who are
not related to the applicant, who do not live with the applicant, who are
not police officers and who have known the applicant for at least one year.
This
requirement offends the First Amendment, as it requires a person attempting
to exercise one fundamental right, i.e., the right to own and possess a
handgun for traditionally lawful purposes, to forfeit another fundamental
right, i.e., the right to choose those with whom we associate and
communicate. The character reference requirement mandates that
applicants for a pistol license must communicate and associate for a
prolonged period of time with a specific class of persons, irrespective of
the applicant's desire to associate with those persons.
By requiring
citizens of Suffolk County to associate against their will with persons not
of their choosing in order to exercise their right to keep and bear arms,
the Suffolk County requirement of character references violates both the
First and Second Amendments. Under the current regulatory scheme in
Suffolk County, a person applying for a pistol license has a choice: give up
your First Amendment rights, or give up your Second Amendment rights.
Since the protections afforded by the First and Second Amendments are
brought into conflict with each other by the Suffolk County Police
Department's requirements such that both cannot survive concurrently, the
requirements are unconstitutional in violation of both Amendments. The
requirement of character references, therefore, cannot survive
constitutional scrutiny and must be held invalid.
To have standing to
challenge this requirement, a person must have applied for a Suffolk County
pistol license and been denied solely for failure to provide character
references or for having provided character references that do not conform
to the Police Department's requirements. It is important to the
integrity of an action challenging the constitutionality of the character
reference requirement that the applicant meets all of the other requirements
for a pistol license in Suffolk County.
If you meet this
criteria, stand up for your rights and join us in our fight. Send an email
to
support@lifreedomfund.org today. For all others, join us in our
historic fight! Every dollar counts towards preserving our freedoms. Click
the donation button below and help us overturn New York State’s restrictions
on our constitutional rights. Thank you for your support.
The Suffolk County Police Department's Pistol
Licensing Procedures Violate the Second and Fourteenth Amendments to the
United States Constitution.
The Fourteenth
Amendment to the United States Constitution prohibits states from making or
enforcing any law which abridges the privileges of citizens of the United
States; or which deprives any person of a liberty, without due process of
law. The Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms is a fundamental
liberty and a privilege of citizens of the United States for the purposes of
the Fourteenth Amendment.
The Suffolk County
Police Department's procedures for determining eligibility for a pistol
license include a requirement that applicants must disclose and explain to
the satisfaction of an investigating officer the circumstances of each and
every arrest or field appearance ticket issued to the applicant irrespective
of the outcome of the charge. A person who has been found not guilty
of an offense with which he or she has been charged, or whose charge has
been dismissed, can nonetheless be found guilty of the charge by the Suffolk
County Police Department for the purpose of determining that an applicant is
not worthy of a pistol license.
The investigating
officer improperly makes findings of fact with respect to a criminal charge
that are constitutionally reserved to a judge or jury and can find that an
applicant acted in violation of a law despite the charge having been
dismissed or the applicant having been found not guilty at trial. This
procedure clearly offends the Fourteenth Amendment as well as the Second
Amendment and must be held unconstitutional as it deprives persons of their
Second Amendment liberties and abridges a privilege of citizens of the
United States without due process of law.
To have standing to
challenge this requirement, a person must have applied for a Suffolk County
pistol license and been denied solely on the basis of a finding with respect
to an offense with which the applicant was charged, where the applicant was
found not guilty of the charge at trial or where the charge was dismissed.
It is important to the integrity of an action challenging this requirement
that the applicant meets all the other requirements for a pistol license in
Suffolk County, and that the peripheral facts surround the incident at
issue, with which the applicant was not charged, do not include anything
that alone would justify a denial.
If you meet this
criteria, stand up for your rights and join us in our fight. Send an email
to
support@lifreedomfund.org today. For all others, join us in our
historic fight! Every dollar counts towards preserving our freedoms.
The Suffolk County Police Department's Pistol
Licensing Procedures Violate the Second Amendment to the United States
Constitution.
The Second Amendment to the United States Constitution protects the
individual right to keep and bear arms. This fundamental liberty includes
the right to own and possess a handgun for traditionally lawful purposes.
A fundamental right protected by the United States Constitution cannot be
denied or abridged by the governmental imposition of unreasonable, arbitrary
or capricious obstacles to the exercise of that right. A requirement that
has no rational relationship to the right at issue and which is sufficiently
vague as to make inconsistent application of the requirement possible is not
constitutionally permissible.
The Suffolk County Police Department's procedures for determining
eligibility for a pistol license include a requirement that applicants must
be of good moral character. There is no rational relationship, however,
between a person's moral character and his or her exercise of the right to
keep and bear arms. As such, poor moral character cannot serve as a bar to
the exercise of the unrelated fundamental right to keep and bear arms for
traditionally lawful purposes.
Additionally, there is no statutory definition of "good moral character" for
the purpose of issuance of pistol licenses in Suffolk County. The natural
consequence of such a vague and undefined requirement is that the Suffolk
County Police Department may find for any reason it sees fit that a person
lacks good moral character and may deny a pistol license to any person for
that reason.
Since the good moral character requirement constitutes an imposition of
unreasonable, arbitrary and capricious obstacles to the exercise of a
fundamental right and is not rationally related thereto, it directly offends
the protections afforded by the Second Amendment. The requirement of good
moral character, therefore, cannot survive constitutional scrutiny and must
be held invalid.
To have standing to challenge this requirement, a person must have applied
for a Suffolk County pistol license and been denied solely on the basis of
lacking good moral character. It is important to the integrity of an action
challenging the constitutionality of the good moral character requirement
that the applicant meets all the other requirements for a pistol license in
Suffolk County, and that the underlying facts leading to the determination
that the applicant lacks good moral character do not include anything that
standing alone would justify a denial.
The Suffolk County Police Department's pistol licensing procedures are
littered with other examples of our Second Amendment protections being
denied or abridged by the imposition of unreasonable, arbitrary or
capricious obstacles. These examples include the requirement that
applicants disclose details of their private medical history. Such
constitutional challenges would follow the same course as the challenge
outlined above.
If you have been denied a pistol license in Suffolk County because the
licensing officer determined that you lack “good moral character”, or if you
have been denied because you refused to disclose details of your private
medical history, stand up for your rights and join us in our fight. Send an
email to
support@lifreedomfund.org
today. For all others, join us in our historic fight! Every dollar counts
towards preserving our freedoms. Click the donation button below and help us
overturn New York State’s restrictions on our constitutional rights. Thank
you for your support.
Click the donation button below and help us overturn New York
State’s restrictions on our constitutional rights. Thank you for your
support.
Click
here to go back to Long Island Firearms

|