Long Island Firearms Freedom Fund

 

Please read below for details:

CHALLENGE TO THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF SECTION 400.00 OF THE PENAL LAW OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

 

New York State's Handgun Licensing Scheme Violates the Second and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution.

      Article 265 of the Penal Law of the State of New York imposes a general ban on handgun possession.  Article 400 provides certain narrow exceptions to the general ban and is New York State's firearms licensing statute.  It sets forth the requirements for eligibility for licenses to carry, possess, repair and dispose of firearms.  While most of the provisions of the statute generally offend common notions of freedom and individual rights, those provisions relating to licenses to possess or carry handguns violate the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution, which guarantees the individual right to possess a handgun for traditionally lawful purposes.            

      The Second Amendment to the United States Constitution protects the individual right to keep and bear arms.  This fundamental liberty includes the right to own and possess a handgun for traditionally lawful purposes and to carry a handgun within the home. Section 400.00 (1) (b) codifies a constitutionally impermissible "good moral character" requirement, which for the reasons discussed below offend the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution and should not survive a proper challenge.

      Equally impermissible are the provisions of sections 400.00 (1) (g), (2) (f) and (3) (a), which shift the burden of the state to establish a valid basis for denial of a pistol license to the applicant to show good cause for issuance of the license.  Laws drafted in this manner are indicative of a general prohibition, which can only be overcome by meeting certain requirements, the burden of proof of which falls upon the citizen.  Such laws are generally unconstitutional where the ban at issue is a restraint on a fundamental right.

      Section 400.00 (11) of the Penal Law of the State of New York grants the handgun licensing officers of Suffolk and Nassau Counties and the City of New York the authority to revoke or cancel a pistol license at any time for any reason.  No state possesses the power to issue such a grant of authority with respect to a fundamental right, and such a grant exceeds the constitutionally permissible powers of the State of New York to restrain the right to keep and bear arms.  Simply stated, the power to unilaterally deny a fundamental right at will with no accountability renders the right meaningless and negates it utterly.  Section 400 (11) of the Penal Law grants to transient municipal employees the power to negate provisions of the Federal Constitution.  As such, New York State's handgun licensing scheme violates the Second Amendment to the Constitution and cannot stand.

      Moreover, section 400.00 (11) of the Penal Law provides a substantially different restraint for citizens of Suffolk and Nassau Counties and the City of New York than for citizens living elsewhere in the State of New York.  Whereas the handgun licensing officers of Suffolk, Nassau, and New York City may unilaterally divest citizens of their fundamental right to keep and bear arms, that power is reserved to judges elsewhere in the State.  This disparity leaves the Second Amendment rights of Suffolk, Nassau and New York City residents to the whim of unelected civil servants with little or no legal education, while the rights of citizens elsewhere in the State are left to the whim of elected judicial officers who generally have a substantial legal education and have been elected to office by the people they serve.  Such a disparity runs afoul of the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause, which is intended to prevent such unequal treatment of citizens under the law.

      When evaluating the constitutionality of a state law restraining a fundamental right, the courts will apply one of three levels of scrutiny.  "Strict scrutiny" is the highest level, in which a law restraining a fundamental right is held unconstitutional unless it is narrowly tailored to serve a compelling government interest and there is no less restrictive alternative available to achieve that compelling interest.  "Intermediate scrutiny" is the level in which a law restraining a fundamental right will be held unconstitutional unless it is substantially related to an important government interest.  "Rational-basis test" is the lowest level, in which a law restraining a fundamental right will be held constitutional so long as it is reasonably related to a legitimate government interest.  While it is unclear at this time which level of scrutiny will apply to the Second Amendment, the restraints imposed by the laws of the State of New York on the right to keep and bear arms cannot survive any level of scrutiny, since they do not provide bases of restraints on the right, but rather set forth criteria a citizen must meet in order to prove worthiness to exercise the right.  Additionally, New York State's handgun licensing scheme renders the Second Amendment impotent, as it allows for the denial of the right to keep and bear arms at any time and for any reason.

      New York State's handgun licensing laws can be challenged by seeking a declaratory judgment rendering it unconstitutional in part or in full, or by citizens with standing to bring an action other than for a declaratory judgment.  To have standing to challenge this provision of state law, a person must have standing as set forth in any of the sections above, or must have had a pistol license suspended or revoked for reasons other than an arrest, conviction, a mental incapacitation, or by virtue of a court order of protection.  Based on the nature of the statutory scheme in question and the issues at hand, an action seeking a declaratory judgment seems to be the most appropriate vehicle for seeking the relief mandated by the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution.

If you have been aggrieved by New York State’s licensing requirements, and you feel you have standing to challenge the constitutionality of New York State’s licensing statute, stand up for your rights and join us in our fight. Send an email to support@lifreedomfund.org today.

For all others, join us in our historic fight! Every dollar counts towards preserving our freedoms. Click the donation button below and help us overturn New York State’s restrictions on our constitutional rights. Thank you for your support.

Click here to go back to Long Island Firearms

 

 

Legal Disclaimer:

We are not formally organized to teach firearms proficiency. Our members and Moderators are a confederation of individuals offering individual opinions only. Opinions can never preclude the mandate to seek professional training in the areas of firearms use, firearms modifications and handloading. The proceeds and all funds for this cause is not-for-profit and is filed under the laws governing US 501(c)(3). Proceed solely at your own risk. While we make every attempt to edit or delete erroneous posts, neither the Moderators nor the Staff are capable of previewing every post. By agreeing to these terms, you agree that responsibility for any post lies with the individual author, and any consequences which result from acting on the information found herein lies solely with you. Copyright © 2009 Long Island Firearms, LLC- You may copy and distribute the above material, as long as credit is given to http://www.liffreedomfund.org and http://www.LongIslandFirearms.com.

Copyright © 2009 LongIslandFirearms.com  All rights reserved